Select Page

University of California Op-Ed Insists Calling Women ‘Females’ Is ‘Dehumanizing’

University of California Op-Ed Insists Calling Women ‘Females’ Is ‘Dehumanizing’

Do you say sexist things?

If so, an attendee of the University of California, Santa Barbara, would like you to stop.

School outlet Daily Nexus recently published an op-ed titled “Stop Calling Women ‘Females.’

“Can we, as a society,” Kenneth Moody asks, “agree to stop referring to women as ‘females’ in casual conversation?”

TRENDING: ‘BROWNSHIRTS OF BIDEN AND FAUCI’: PASTOR MACED AT PORTLAND PRAYER RALLY ALLEGES POLICE COMPLICIT IN ANTIFA AMBUSH

“Outside of biology,” the author explains, “it always feels dehumanizing.”

And: “uncomfortable.”

Perhaps worst of all: “overwhelmingly sexist.”

Brass tacks:

It is time to let the word “female” be reserved for biology class or join the ever-growing dictionary of archaic terminology.

Kenneth contends the use “as a scientific adjective…in medical spaces” isn’t kosher because those spaces “have a history of pathologizing people for who they are.”

From Merriam-Webster:

pathologize: (v) to view or characterize as medically or psychologically abnormal

Need more convincing?

As it so happens, the mental disorder hysteria “was considered an exclusively female disease to justify the notion that women are crazy, while men are not. Even though it is common knowledge now that there is no such thing as female hysteria…”

The writer employs another point prover: a meme in which a man calls “females” “crazy” for having male best friends.

Here, “female” directly alludes to women’s behavior being incomprehensible to “logical” men which harkens back to that history of hysteria.

Furthermore, insists the student, “female,” implies that “women…are a different species from ‘normal’…and therefore less human.”

Using the term, subsequently, suggests a “‘deviant’ characteristic is highlighted to be the only quality that matters, and all the other human qualities like having a family, dreams, emotions, and hobbies disappear.”

If you’re still not getting it, Kenneth goes the extra mile.

The student links to an anime Instagram image of a cartoon warrior.

“I’m fine with you females watching Naruto, but don’t think you’ll EVER understand Sasuke’s true pain like us boys do,” the character is captioned as saying.

Here is a prime example in which a guy is gatekeeping the anime, “Naruto,” by saying that “females” can watch the show but only boys can relate to Sasuke. He is using “females” and “boys” rhetorically to create and exaggerate a distinction between what is for women and what is for men. The meme communicates that even if women watch anime, the “innate” difference between “females” and “boys” makes any woman watching anime invalid.

Moving on, who refers to women as females?

That would be “only men.”

Shamefully, “it rarely goes the other way around.”

Given the worldwide history of sexism and gender inequality, men using an animalistic term like that makes sense, as it linguistically degrades women and asserts their own dominant social status.

The final reason for not calling women “female” is that it “reaffirms our entire binary gender system.”

So it’s okay to call them women, but not female.

No word on whether “chicks” is allowed.

Language and sex are certainly areas where walking on eggshells may be advised.

It’s sure confusing out there these days.

Culturally, in general, we’re living in a state of constant update.

Recent reminders:

‘A Man is a Man, and a Woman is a Woman’: Student Suspended for Violating Students’ Dignity ‘Til He Completes a ‘Remediation Plan’

Breastfeeding Academy Bails on ‘Breasts’

Harvard Professor Insists There Are Two Sexes, Colleague Is ‘Appalled’

Transgender TV Star: ‘If a Woman Has a Penis, Her Penis is a Biologically Female Penis’

Texas Democratic Representative Claims There Are Six ‘Biological Sexes’

Bonus if you’ve mastered the above:

Late Night Host Vows Not to Play Food Game With Bull Penis Because of Racism

Back to Kenneth, the presumed feminist isn’t the only one finished with “female.”

As noted by Campus Reform, UC Berkeley Professor Robin Lakoff made a similar argument in 2016.

She laid it out to Time:

“[To refer to a woman as female] is to subtly downgrade her to a lower mammalian status, rather like calling a guy an ‘ape.’”

Think about it:

To be able to call a guy an ape is possible only when he is a particular kind of guy — clumsy, brutish, etc. But any woman can be called, disparagingly, a “female” just because of the chromosome thing.

So there ya go.

And in case you were wondering, Kenneth, didn’t take a stand for only ladies:

 [W]hen “female” is used as a synonym for women, a loaded history is being alluded to. This is not much different than the reason why we do not refer to gay people as “homosexuals.”

With all due respect, where those with XX chromosomes are concerned, Kenneth may have more miles to go:

TRENDING: WHISTLEBLOWER PROVIDES PROOF FROM DETROIT TCF CENTER THAT ELECTION COMPUTERS WERE CONNECTED ONLINE — WITH PHOTO

The lunacy of the left knows no bounds; trans who have penises have women’s penises. We can’t call ladies females. There are arguments over basic biology that all mammals, regardless of class, are made binaries are males and females.

I think it is time to send these adults back to kindergarten; I remember having a nephew who stood and proudly told the class that boys have penis and girls have vaginas. The part of him trying to pull down his pants for show and tell, maybe that is best forgotten; the poor guy is almost 30 now, maybe we should let that go.

Cross-posted from Red State

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

About The Author

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *